<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Locally uniform convergence to an equilibrium for nonlinear parabolic equations on $R^N$</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Yihong Du</dc:creator><dc:creator>Peter Polacik</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>35K15</dc:subject><dc:subject>35B40</dc:subject><dc:subject>semilinear parabolic equations</dc:subject><dc:subject>bounded solutions</dc:subject><dc:subject>convergence</dc:subject>
<dc:description>We consider bounded solutions of the Cauchy problem
\[
\begin{cases}
u_t-\Delta u=f(u),&amp;x\in\mathbb{R}^N,\ t&gt;0,\\
u(0,x)=u_0(x),&amp;x\in\mathbb{R}^N,
\end{cases}
\]
where $u_0$ is a non-negative function with compact support and $f$ is a $C^1$ function on $\mathbb{R}$ with $f(0)=0$. Assuming that $f&#39;$ is locally H\&quot;older continuous, and that $f$ satisfies a minor nondegeneracy condition, we prove that, as $t\to\infty$, the solution $u(\cdot,t)$ converges to an equilibrium $\varphi$ locally uniformly in $\mathbb{R}^N$. Moreover, either the limit function $\varphi$ is a constant equilibrium, or there is a point $x_0\in\mathbb{R}^N$ such that $\varphi$ is radially symmetric and radially decreasing about $x_0$, and it approaches a constant equilibrium as $|x-x_0|\to\infty$. The nondegeneracy condition only concerns a specific set of zeros of $f$, and we make no assumption whatsoever on the nonconstant equilibria. The set of such equilibria can be very complicated, and indeed a complete understanding of this set is usually beyond reach in dimension $N\geq2$. Moreover, because of the symmetries of the equation, there are always continua of such equilibria. Our result shows that the assumption &quot;$u_0$ has compact support&quot; is powerful enough to guarantee that, first, the equilibria that can possibly be observed in the $\omega$-limit set of $u$ have a rather simple structure; and, second, exactly one of them is selected. Our convergence result remains valid if $\Delta u$ is replaced by a general elliptic operator of the form $\sum_{i,j} a_{ij}u_{x_ix_j}$ with constant coefficients $a_{ij}$.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher>Indiana University Mathematics Journal</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2015</dc:date>
<dc:type>text</dc:type>
<dc:format>pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>10.1512/iumj.2015.64.5535</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>10.1512/iumj.2015.64.5535</dc:source>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Indiana Univ. Math. J. 64 (2015) 787 - 824</dc:relation>
<dc:coverage>state-of-the-art mathematics</dc:coverage>
<dc:rights>http://iumj.org/access/</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>