<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Fractal and multifractal dimensions of prevalent measures</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Lars Olsen</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>28A80</dc:subject><dc:subject>multifractals</dc:subject><dc:subject>Hausdorff dimension</dc:subject><dc:subject>packing dimension</dc:subject><dc:subject>local dimension</dc:subject><dc:subject>prevalence</dc:subject><dc:subject>shyness</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Let $K$ be a compact subset of $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ and write $\mathcal{P}(K)$ for the family of Borel probability measures on $K$. In this paper we study different fractal and multifractal dimensions of measures $\mu$ in $\mathcal{P}(K)$ that are generic in the sense of prevalence. We first prove a general result, namely, for an arbitrary ``dimension&#39;&#39; function $\Delta: \mathcal{P}(K) \to \mathbb{R}$ satisfying various natural scaling and monotonicity conditions, we obtain a formula for the ``dimension&#39;&#39; $\Delta(\mu)$ of a prevalent measure $\mu$ in $\mathcal{P}(K)$; this is the content of Theorem 1.1. By applying Theorem 1.1 to appropriate choices of $\Delta$ we obtain the following results: \begin{itemize}\item By letting $\Delta(\mu)$ equal the (lower or upper) local dimension of $\mu$ at a point $x \in K$ and applying Theorem 1.1 to this particular choice of $\Delta$, we compute the (lower and upper) local dimension of a prevalent measure $\mu$ in $\mathcal{P}(K)$. \item By letting $\Delta(\mu)$ equal the multifractal spectrum of $\mu$ and applying Theorem 1.1 to this particular choice of $\Delta$, we compute the multifractal spectrum of a prevalent measure $\mu$ in $\mathcal{P}(K)$. \item Finally, by letting $\Delta(\mu)$ equal the Hausdorff or packing dimension of $\mu$ and applying Theorem 1.1 to this particular choice of $\Delta$, we compute the Hausdorff and packing dimension of a prevalent measure $\mu$ in $\mathcal{P}(K)$.\end{itemize} Perhaps surprisingly, in all cases our results are very different from the corresponding results for measures that are generic in the sense of Baire category.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher>Indiana University Mathematics Journal</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2010</dc:date>
<dc:type>text</dc:type>
<dc:format>pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>10.1512/iumj.2010.59.3991</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>10.1512/iumj.2010.59.3991</dc:source>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Indiana Univ. Math. J. 59 (2010) 661 - 690</dc:relation>
<dc:coverage>state-of-the-art mathematics</dc:coverage>
<dc:rights>http://iumj.org/access/</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>