<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>On Kato&#39;s conditions for vanishing viscosity</dc:title>
<dc:creator>James Kelliher</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>76D05</dc:subject><dc:subject>76B99</dc:subject><dc:subject>76D99</dc:subject><dc:subject>inviscid limit</dc:subject><dc:subject>vanishing viscosity limit</dc:subject><dc:subject>Navier-Stokes equations</dc:subject><dc:subject>Euler equations</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Let $u$ be a solution to the Navier-Stokes equations with viscosity $\nu$ in a bounded domain $\Omega$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, $d \ge 2$, and let $\bar{u}$ be the solution to the Euler equations in $\Omega$. In 1983 Tosio Kato showed that for sufficiently regular solutions, $u \to \bar{u}$ in $L^{\infty}([0, T] ; L^2(\Omega))$ as $\nu \to 0$ if and only if $\nu \| \nabla u \|_X^2 \to 0$ as $\nu \to 0$, where $X = L^2([0, T] \times \Gamma_{c \nu})$, $\Gamma_{c \nu}$ being a layer of thickness $c \nu$ near the boundary.  We show that Kato&#39;s condition is equivalent to $\nu \| \omega(u) \|_X^2 \to 0$ as $\nu \to 0$, where $\omega(u)$ is the vorticity (curl) of $u$, and is also equivalent to $\nu^{-1} \| u \|_X^2 \to 0$ as $\nu \to 0$.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher>Indiana University Mathematics Journal</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2007</dc:date>
<dc:type>text</dc:type>
<dc:format>pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>10.1512/iumj.2007.56.3080</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>10.1512/iumj.2007.56.3080</dc:source>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Indiana Univ. Math. J. 56 (2007) 1711 - 1721</dc:relation>
<dc:coverage>state-of-the-art mathematics</dc:coverage>
<dc:rights>http://iumj.org/access/</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>